|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
45
   |
Posted - 2013.04.09 23:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Gypsio III wrote:Jezza McWaffle wrote:With the missiles. Would not having 2 types of cruise missile and buffing torps be a good idea?
Example:
- Long range cruise missiles.
Have faster travel time and sligtly lower explosion radius, current dps
- Short range cruise missiles
Around 35km range, decent dps (think ultraviolet damage and range), slightly higher explosion radius and slower travel time
Maybe we could call the short-range type "torpedoes"? 
You missed the point there. The suggestion was to give cruise missiles ammo versatility the same way a projectile ship can switch between fusion and titanium sabbot at different ranges. |
Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ranamar wrote:Admittedly, it requires a little extra training time, and more for the battleship weapons, but the other gun types don't get that thing you're describing without T2 ammo, either.
What? Every weapons system except for missiles gets variable ammunition choices at purely t1 with no training.
Projectiles: Fusion et al for close range, Titanium Sabbot et al for longer range / better tracking
Hybrids: Antimatter for up close blasting, Lead et al for longer ranges
Lasers: Multifrequency at point blank all the way out to Radio at extreme range
These are all in addition to the T2 close/long range ammo choices, although scorch renders the laser t1 ammo aside from MF completely pointless |
Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 16:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Danny John-Peter wrote:The Raven got better and the Rokh stays largely the same (Ie Still good).
I havent looked at the Scorp but from what I read it got better too.
Basically, what?
The Raven improved slightly from its current position, but it's irrelevant because there's nothing the new Raven will be able to do that the Typhoon can't do better.
The scorpion is also improved, but it remains to be seen if it's enough when you account for the recent large nerfs to ECM.
The Rokh (along with the Abaddon) have been nerfed slightly while the primary nullsec fleet BS (Maelstrom) has been buffed for some unknown reason.
Overall there doesn't look like there's a single Caldari battleship that's going to come out of the balncing in a good position compared to any of the other options. |
Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 17:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Deacon Abox wrote:So, stop whining. 
No. |
Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
47
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 19:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Octoven wrote:
Are you seriously comparing battleships from two different tiers?
...
Your argument is irrelevant.
Have you heard of this thing called tiericide? |
Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
58
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 13:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Constance Skye wrote:Can you add more drone space to the Rokh. More bandwidth would be great.
Considering that CCP just removed bandwidth from the single Caldari T1 hull that could use Heavies/Sentries, that's unlikely to happen. I just hope they don't **** the CNR when they get to navy battleships.
Edit: I forgot the Scorpion had 75 bw too, but who wants to fly scorpions anyway |
|
|
| |
|